EIU-PARIS Postdoctoral Degree

 Enhance your professional status with

EIU-PARIS POSTDOCTORAL DEGREE

Overview:

Post Doctoral Degree is a special 12 months program of the EIU-Paris, dedicated to candidates who already have a recognized and accredited Doctoral degree (PhD, DBA, EDD, etc.), who wish to applying for a Postdoctoral position, by raising their personal awareness on the academic job market and providing insights into practicalities associated with applications for Postdoctoral fellowships.

During the course of study, the candidates will consider the transition from PhD to PostDoc, starting from finding a new supervisor, writing fellowship applications, and being successful as a researcher. The training approach is based on an active interaction between a senior professor and participants, with a balanced mix between discussion and practical activities, including concepts of storytelling and paper publication techniques. All participants will create a personal action plan.

Target group:

PhD holders. Priority is given to those in the phase of applying to Postdoctoral fellowships.

EIU-Paris does not accept PostDoc candidates in the following cases:

• Graduates of PhD programs are not accredited or have been found to be fake university.

• The candidate has a problem with research ethics.

• The candidate has been found to have plagiarism

Mandatory Training and Orientation

All POSTDOCTORAL students must complete the suite of mandatory training modules prescribed by the University. It is the responsibility of the Research Supervisor to ensure that POSTDOCTORAL students under their supervision complete the appropriate and prescribed courses pertinent to their research area.

The mandatory Modules:

1. Advanced Research Methodology

2. Writing Up and Communicating Research

3. Publishing a Research Paper

4. Research Supervision

Part 1 - Advanced Research Methodology

“Advanced Research Methods” is a required course for all students pursuing the Postdoctoral programme. This course provides a study of quantitative and qualitative methods used to conduct business and management related research with a focus on the application of appropriate research models to the critique of published research and the preparation of research reports. Emphasized is the ability to use research and research methods in the development and completion of a research project in business and management related settings.

Course outcomes
At the end of the program, participants will:

• develop an in-depth understanding of research designs, methodologies and analysis techniques used in business research;

• develop an analytical skill in reviewing and critiquing the literature;

• apply the appropriate statistical tests to meet the research objectives/questions;

• conduct an independent study for Postdoctoral research;

• write a complete research proposal and publishable research papers professionally, legally and ethically in conducting research activities.

Part 2 - Writing Up and Communicating Research

The course teaches on how to effectively communicate your research in scientific presentations, papers and posters. It will help students address a wide range of audiences, from peers to decision-makers and the general public. In addition, there will be a preparation assignment before the course and a small project to be conducted during the course. The preparation assignments and the project will be worked on remotely, based on electronic communication with the instructors/supervisor.

Course outcomes
At the end of the program, participants will:

• be aware of the sequence of a research report;

• understand the essential contents and purpose of each part of the report;

• be able to write a research report in a conventional and acceptable style;

• understand how to prepare and deliver an effective oral presentation.

Part 3 - Publishing a Research Paper

This module “Publishing a Research Paper” conveys the know-how of scientific writing & publishing and creates a basis for long-term development of participants’ scientific writing skills. The main goal is to learn how to effectively write research findings and publish successful research articles.

Course outcomes
At the end of the program, participants will:

• able to select a journal for publication and submit your paper;

• navigate the editorial process, including how to write cover letters;

• classify the peer review process;

• recognize the different editorial decisions and how to appeal them;

• explain ethical considerations, such as duplicate submission.

Part 4 - Research Supervision

This course is mandatory for all participants wishing to be appointed as research supervisors at European International University (EIU), including participants with experience of research supervision at other institutions. Experienced EIU supervisors are also encouraged to work through the course as a refresher and central resource containing information, guidance and links to relevant policies and materials.

Course outcomes
At the end of the program, participants will:

• understand EIU policy and procedure for effective supervision;

• have shared experiences and challenges with peers;

• know where to find further support and guidance;

• establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with your supervisees.

Assessment

The supervisor will establish the POSTDOCTORAL Student’s responsibilities and will provide the POSTDOCTORAL students with:

• a 6-month probationary evaluation;

• subsequent yearly evaluations;

• an end of programme evaluation;

• an Individual Development Plan (IDP) must be developed by the POSTDOCTORAL student and the supervisor to define and communicate to the POSTDOCTORAL students the expectations for the duration of programme. The IDP will be used to evaluate the POSTDOCTORAL students’ performance on a yearly basis and at the end of the POSTDOCTORAL programme together with Publications.

Head of Program

He is a results-oriented CEO with demonstrated record of accomplishment in streamlining operations, increasing profits and maximizing market penetration. Experienced Logistics and Supply Chain Manager with over 12 years of experience in electronic industry (INTEL TECHNOLOGY). He is also the President for ISCEA Malaysia and the Member of Global ISCEA Standard Board.

PostDoc Degree Study Plan

1st PostDoc Research Colloquium (Commencement of the Study)
4-day Intensive PostDoc tutorial seminar on:
• Advanced Research Methodology
• Writing Up and Communicating Research

*USD490 for PostDoc Researh Colloquium fees.

2nd PostDoc Research Colloquium (6th Month of the Study)
4-day Intensive PostDoc tutorial seminar on:
• Publishing a Research Paper
• Research Supervision

*USD490 for PostDoc Researh Colloquium fees.

*EIU-Paris PostDoc students are required to attend all two (4) PostDoc Research Colloquium in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and in Bangkok, Thailand. The Colloquium fees mentioned above is to cover the cost of the hotel accommodation in a twin-sharing room, breakfast, lunch and coffee break during the PhD study sessions, welcoming dinner, training notes, Certificate of Participation and other miscellaneous costs. 

EIU-Paris PostDoc Degree Tuition Fee  

The PostDoct Degree tuition fee is USD6,000 after deduct 50% scholarship.

You can pay your PostDoc Degree tuition fees in 2 easy payments as follows:

• 1st payment USD3,000 to be paid upon registration plus USD100 Application Fee.

• 2nd payment USD3,000 to be paid on your 2nd PostDoc Research Colloquium.

CONTACT

PhD Academy 
Your trusted academic partner
(A division of TIMES Global Education Ltd)

No. 30, Sukhumvit 61 Road, Wattana
Bangkok, Thailand
Tel: +6016-4462200 (WhatsApp, Zalo, Line)
Website: www.TimesGlobal.Education/PhDAcademy
Email: drbenlee@timesglobal.education

References:

Main reference (Textbook):

1. Veera Pandiyan, K.S., Premkumar, R., Atikah Shamsul, B., Rohani, M., Nazura, M. S., Akamal, A.O., (2000). Research Methodology: tools, Method & techniques. Malaysia Logistics and Supply Chain Association (MLSCA)

2. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach, 7th ed. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons.

3. Kumar, R. (2018). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

4. Hair, J.F., Money, A.H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2017). Research Methods for Business. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

5. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research Methods for Business Students. Harlow: Prentice Hall.

Supporting References (Journals):

6. 3a.American Psychological Association (2013). Publication manual of American Psychological Association. Washington: American Psychological Association.

7. Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research, Qualitative Sociology, 42,139–160

8. Astarin, P.K. (2013). Qualitative research designs: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 2(1), 118-124.

9. Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6), 1173-1182.

10. Bartlett, J.E. II, Kotrlit, J.W., & Higgins, C.C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43-50.

11. Brennan, N. (2019). 100 PhD rules of the game to successfully complete a doctoral dissertation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(1), 364-376.

12. Chin, W.W., Peterson, R.A., & Brown, S.P. (2008). Structural equation modeling in marketing: Some practical reminders. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16(4), 287–298.

13. Church, R.M. (2001). The effective use of secondary data. Learning and Motivation, 33, 32-45.

14. 10a.Colquitt, J.A., & Zapata-Phelant, C.P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1281–1303.

15. 10b.Doody O, Bailey ME (2016) Setting a research question, aim and objective. Nurse Researcher, 23(4), 19-23.

16. Dunn, S.L., Arslanian-Engoren, C., DeKoekkoek, T., Jadack, R., & Scott, L.D. (2015). Secondary data analysis as an efficient and effective approach to nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 1–13.

17. Fairchild, A.J., & McQuillin, S.D. (2010). Evaluating mediation and moderation effects in school psychology: A presentation of methods and review of current practice. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 53-84.

18. 12a.Farrugia, P., Petrisor, B.A., Farrokhyar F., & Bhandari, M. (2010). Research questions, hypotheses and objectives, Canadian Journal of Surgery, 53(4), 278-281.

19. Fernandez, K.V. (2019). Critically reviewing literature: A tutorial for new researchers. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 27, 187-196.

20. Giddings, L.S., & Grant, B.M. (2006). Mixed methods research for the novice researcher. Contemporary Nurse, 23(1), 3-11.

21. Green, H.E. (2014). Use of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 21(6), 34-38.

22. Greenhot, A.F., & Dowsett, C.J. (2012). Secondary data analysis: An important tool for addressing developmental questions. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13(1), 2-18.

23. Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study. Halmstad, Sweden: Halmstad University.

24. Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & de Lacey, S. (2016) Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501.

25. Harling, K. (2012). An overview of case study. SSRN Electronic Journal, September, 1-11.

26. Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative Studies. Evidenced Based Nursing, 18(3), 66-67.

27. 21a. Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2018). What is case study? Evidenced Based Nursing, 21(1), 1-2.

28. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. 92008). Structural Equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.

29. Hox, J.J., & Boeije, H.R. (2005). Data collection, primary vs. secondary. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. 593-599.

30. Imenda, S. (2014). Is There a Conceptual Difference between Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks? Journal of Social Science, 38(2), 185-195.

31. Johnston, M.P. (2014). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 3(6), 19 –626.

32. Khaldi, K. (2017). Quantitative, qualitative or mixed research: which research paradigm to use? Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(2), 15-24.

33. Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A.B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26-41.

34. Krejcie,R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.

35. 27a. Løkke, A. & Dissing Sørensen, P. (2014). Theory testing using case studies. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 12(1), 66-74.

36. Lowry, L.D. (2015). Bridging the business data divide: Insights into primary and secondary data use by business researchers. IASSIST Quarterly, 39(2), 14-25.

37. MacKinnon, D.P., Coxe, S., & Baraldi, A.N. (2012). Guidelines for the investigation of mediating variables in business research. Journal of Business Psychology, 27, 1-14.

38. 29a.Müller-Bloch, C., & Kranz, J. (2015). A Framework for Rigorously Identifying Research Gaps in Qualitative Literature Reviews. Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth.

39. Mohajan, H. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: validity and reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University, 17(3), 58-82

40. Nenty, H.J. (2009). Writing a quantitative research thesis. International Journal of Educational Science, 1(1), 19-32.

41. Nicholson, S.W., & Bennet, T.B. (2008). Transparent practices: Primary and secondary data in business ethics dissertations. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 417-425.

42. Pandey, P., & Pandey, M.M. (2015). Research methodology: Tools and techniques, 1st ed. Romania: Bridge Center.

43. 33a.Pardede, P. (2018). Identifying and formulating the research problem. Research in ELT, 1-13.

44. Perry, C. (1998). A structured approach to presenting theses: Notes for students and their supervisor. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), June, 1-57.

45. Pham, L. (2017). A Review of key paradigms: positivism, interpretivism and critical inquiry. The University of Adelaide.

46. Ponelis, S.R. (2015). Using interpretive qualitative case studies for exploratory research in doctoral studies: A case of Information Systems research in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 535-550.

47. Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D., & Hayes, A.F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.

48. Rashid Shah, S. (2013). Research Paradigms: Researchers’ Worldviews, Theoretical Frameworks and Study designs. Arab World English Journal, 4(4), 252-264.

49. Rengasamy, D. (2017). Adopting secondary data is boon for accounting research- conceptual study. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, 2(11), 33-37.

50. Rocco, T.S., & Plakhotnik, M.S. (2009). Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical frameworks: Terms, functions, and distinctions. Human Resource Development Review 8(1), 20-130.

51. 40a.Roopa, S., & Rani, M.S. (2012). Questionnaire designing for a survey. The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 46(4), 273-277

52. Rotfeld, H.J. (2014). The pragmatic importance of theory for marketing practice. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31(4), 322-327.

53. Sandeloski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 8, 179-1 83.

54. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. &, Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students, 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson.

55. Schumacker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. (2001). A beginner’s guide to Structural equation modeling A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation, 1st ed. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

56. 44a.Sellheim, M., & Scott Polar Research Institute. (2017). A pocket guide to academic publishing. Rovaniemi: University of the Arctic.

57. 44b.Shoket, M. (2014). Research problem: Identification and formulation. International Journal of Research (IJR), 1(4), 512-518.

58. Sinclair M. (2007) Editorial: A guide to understanding theoretical and conceptual frameworks. Evidence Based Midwifery 5(2), 39.

59. Starman, A.B. (2013). The case study as a type of qualitative research. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 1, 28-43.

60. 46a.Sudheesh, K., Duggappa, D.R., & Nethra, S.S. (2016). How to write a research proposal? Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, September, 60(9), 631-634.

61. Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(3), 28-36.

62. Tomarken, A.J., & Waller, N.G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 31-65.

63. 48a. Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2008). Stepping stones to achieving your doctorate. England: McGraw-Hill.

64. Vissak, T. (2010). Recommendations for using the case study method in international business research. The Qualitative Report, 15(2), 370-388.

65. West, J. (2015). Quantitative method in finance: from detachment to ethical engagement. Journal of Business Ethics. 129(3), 599-611.

66. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2017). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112.

67. Wilkins, S., Neri, S., & Jonathan, L. (2019). The role of theory in the business/management PhD: How students may use theory to make an original contribution to knowledge. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(3).

68. Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9, 1-6.